Paper submissions should be in English and full paper should be no less than
8 pages, in the
1-column format, including all the possible appendices.
Any paper of more than 10 pages will be charged for pages exceeding the
Presentation & Publication: Full paper
Presentation Only without Publication: Abstract
Confidentiality: The review process of ASIG is confidential. Reviewers are volunteers not part of the ASIG organisation and their efforts are greatly appreciated. The practice of keeping all information confidential during the review is part of the standard communication to all reviewers. Misuse of confidential information is a severe professional failure and appropriate measures will be taken when brought to the attention of ASIG organizers. It should be noted, however, that the organisation of ASIG is not and cannot be held responsible for the consequences when reviewers break confidentiality.
Conflict Responsibilities: If a paper is found to have an undeclared or incorrect institutional conflict, the paper may be summarily rejected. To avoid undeclared conflicts, the author list is considered to be final after the submission deadline and no changes are allowed for accepted papers.
Double Blind Review: ASIG reviewing is double blind, in that authors do not know the names of the area chair/reviewers of their papers, and the area chairs/reviewers cannot, beyond reasonable doubt, infer the names of the authors from the submission and the additional material. Avoid providing information that may identify the authors in the acknowledgments (e.g., co-workers and grant IDs) and in the supplemental material (e.g., titles in the movies, or attached papers). Avoid providing links to websites that identify the authors. Violation of any of these guidelines may lead to rejection without review. If you need to cite a different paper of yours that is being submitted concurrently to ASIG, the authors should (1) cite these papers; (2) argue in the body of your paper why your ASIG paper is non trivially different from these concurrent submissions; and (3) include anonymized versions of those papers in the supplemental material.
Plagiarism: ASIG is utterly intolerant of plagiarism. Submitted papers are expected to contain original work executed by the authors with adequate, proper and scholarly citations to the work of others. It is the job of the authors to clearly identify both their own contribution(s) and also published results / techniques on which they depend or build. Reviewers are charged to ensure these standards are met.